~~ REB RREMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 $, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Docket No: 8101-14
AO Taree BATS
ween WALL 6a aie S
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 8
July 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised
in our letter of 15 May 1998, that your application had been
denied. .
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
“after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the sheriff's office report,
even though not previously considered by the Board, was
ansufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
consequentiy, when applying for
naval record, the burden is on t
existence of probable material
a correction of an orth
he applicant ©
error or injustice.
Sincesrelyw cw / 7
Wi, NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09105-08
In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 6 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8072 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the medical evidence that you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11934 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01189-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your receipt of substantial @isability ratings from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13250 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an’official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10921 14
your latest reconsideration request Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 17 November 2011, that your application had been denied. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the jetter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8657 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by 2 Enree- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12084 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. The Board heard your case on 29 March 2011 under docket number #13731-10 and denied your petition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7804 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since leaving the military, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...